

- #US POPULATION DENSITY MAP MANUAL#
- #US POPULATION DENSITY MAP FULL#
- #US POPULATION DENSITY MAP FREE#
22nd March 2015 : Version 2.3 - Radius can now be drawn with a manual radius and location.15th October 2018 : Version 3.0 - Converted to Leaflet maps.2nd October 2019 : Version 3.1 - Adding nodes to polygon not longer causes map to re-zoom.Screenshot of radius population estimate for Dublin, Republic or Ireland Version History Click the button to zoom your map in/out on the area drawn.
#US POPULATION DENSITY MAP FULL#
#US POPULATION DENSITY MAP FREE#
Since the main objective for the free states at the time was the formation of a United States, they made a number of compromises. And since the total voting population of those Northern states was far greater than the total voting population of the states that relied on slavery, the Southern states were afraid that slavery would soon become illegal throughout the nation they were about to join. That’s because there was a strong sentiment in the states whose economies didn’t depend upon slavery to abolish the institution, which was wildly at odds with the stated principles of both the Revolution and the Constitutional Convention.

The electoral college was devised to reassure slave-owners that they could continue to own human beings, at least until the year 1808. It wasn’t to protect the rural citizens from the city-dwellers, whom they outnumbered at the time the Constitution was drafted. It wasn’t to protect farmers in the Midwest, which didn’t yet exist as a region of the U.S. It’s strange that in reading these comments (as of, admittedly late to the party) no one has brought up the purpose of the electoral college. For that matter, I’m not sure how a democracy turns into a mobocracy, except that the majority is one you disagree with. So in a democracy, land has a vote? I’m not sure why that would be the case. People do.”įind these maps interesting? Please leave your comments below and share on social media: You can see an interactive version here.įinally, as Jack Miller put it: “Land doesn’t vote. The colour is who won (blue = Clinton / Red = Trump) and the size is the absolute margin of victory. The two other maps below also try to tackle this issue:Įach circle is centred over a county. You can read the full post here, which is really interesting. A highly saturated blue county was won by Hillary with high percent vote margins. So a highly saturated red county was won by Trump with high percent vote margins. The closer a county gets to gray, the closer the votes were 50:50. Horizontal scale represents vote margins. The Muddy Waters map leverages Color Theory to express vote margins and vote populations in a 2-dimensional scale. Therefore the map at the top of the page and the maps below try to visualise this discrepancy. However those 500 counties had a lot more people, which is why she received over 2.8 million more votes than Trump.

Trump won approximately 2,600 counties compared to Clinton only winning around 500. The map above is an early attempt to solve the issue by showing vote share by county instead of just showing winner takes all.īased on that it seems fair that Trump won the 2016 election. The map above is one of several attempts to improve on the somewhat famous 2016 US Presidential Election Map which you can see below.
